|
|
|
HUMAN DIMENSION REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE
Summary
A regional
roundtable workshop was held for natural resource management
professionals and applied social scientists on April 10th and 11th,
2007 at the University of Texas
Marine Science Institute, Visitors Center Auditorium Port Aransas,
Texas from 8:15 am - 4:00 pm.
Κ
Printer friendly version
of the summary
Welcome and
Introductions / Review of Agenda
- Lee Fuiman, Director, University
of Texas Marine Science Institute
- Ken Dunton, Professor, University
of Texas Marine Science Institute
- Sally Morehead, Assist. Manager,
Mission-Aransas NERR
Plenary Lecture
Land Use
Patterns; How social science can help resource managers and planners
- Dr. Christopher Ellis, Texas A&M
University
Review of
characterization documents and maps
- Tami Beyer, GIS Specialist,
Mission-Aransas NERR
- Sally Morehead, Assist. Manager,
Mission-Aransas NERR
Breakout Session:
Identification of Stakeholders
Who are the individuals and
organizations involved/interested in human usage patterns?
Breakout Session: Information Inventory
What kind of information about human patterns does your organization
produce and/or receive?
County tax roles
UTMSI visitors
Number of tourist
Salt water stamp sales
Hotel/motel tax
Natural Heritage data (The Nature Conservancy)
Building permit revenues
Census
School enrollment (dropout/completion rates)
Texas Natural Resource Information System (aerial photos)
Rockport water sampling group
Fishing license/guide sales
Fishing abundance, harvest and pressure data
Agricultural increment Reports
Texas Demographic Center
Water quality data (TCEQ)
Breakout
Session: Issues associated with human driven change
What are the biggest issues and concerns related to human-driven
change in the Coastal Bend?
Issues identified by breakout group M
(facilitated by Zac Hart) are shown in black and issues identified
by breakout group A (facilitated by Tom Fish) are shown in
blue. Participants were asked to
prioritize their top five issue. The issues were prioritized by
assigning a 5 to the most important issue and a 1 to the least
important issue of their top five. Each issue was then summed so
that those issues with the highest number of votes received the
highest priority and vice versa. Some issues received the same
number of votes and were therefore given the same priority value.
The top five priorities were then discussed in detail. Facilitator
note: Breakout group M voted on priorities opposite from breakout
group A by assigning a 1 to the most important issue and a 5 to the
least important issue of their top five. Sally Morehead reversed
this ranking to match that of the breakout group A. The final
priority order for breakout group M is the same after this reverse
because the original ranking from breakout group M took into account
the total number of votes.
|
Priority |
Issue (rank total) |
|
1 |
Conversion of native habitat (28) |
|
1 |
Maintaining Bay Water Quality (28) |
|
2 |
Loss of Coastal Community Charm (23) |
|
2 |
Education of elected officials about
coastal issues (23) |
|
3 |
Water quality in bays and estuaries (22) |
|
3 |
Public apathy and lack of awareness (22) |
|
4 |
Freshwater inflow into estuary (ecological
effects) (21) |
|
5 |
Natural resource pressures (17) |
|
6 |
Maintaining/Enhancing Infrastructure (16) |
|
7 |
Lack of development controls outside city limits (13) |
|
8 |
Increased runoff and effects (12) |
|
8 |
Sprawl (12) |
|
8 |
Changes in Land Use (12) |
|
9 |
Freshwater inflow and usage (11) |
|
9 |
Biodiversity Conservation w/ whooping
crane as a symbol (11) |
|
10 |
Lack of coordinated public education about natural resources
(10) |
|
10 |
Human waster management and disposal (10) |
|
11 |
Shoreline hardening (9) |
|
11 |
Valuation of Ecosystem Services (9) |
|
12 |
Sufficiency and timeliness of data for
local decision making (8) |
|
13 |
Loss of isolated wetlands (7) |
|
13 |
Sea Level Rise (7) |
|
13 |
Municipal water supply (7) |
|
14 |
Resilience to coastal hazards (5) |
|
15 |
Decreasing quality of life (4) |
|
15 |
Coastal Erosion (4) |
|
16 |
Decreasing public access (3) |
|
16 |
Missing interorganizational collaboration/coordination (3) |
|
16 |
Oyster overharvest and reef destruction (3) |
|
16 |
Community Involvement RE: Awareness (3) |
|
17 |
Lost "sense of place" (2) |
|
17 |
Lack of research on public perceptions (2) |
|
17 |
Human debris (2) |
|
17 |
Coordination Between Stakeholder groups
(2) |
|
17 |
Inability to Maintain a divers economic
community (demographics) (2) |
|
17 |
Economic diversity (2) |
|
18 |
Nutrient loading (1) |
|
18 |
Coordination Between Organizations at
Multiple Levels for Permitting, Etc. (1) |
|
18 |
Promote Tolerance of diverse groups (1) |
|
19 |
Increasing cost of services (taxes) (0) |
|
19 |
Prop scarring of seagrass beds (0) |
|
19 |
Funding availability (0) |
|
19 |
Unmanaged public access on wetlands (0) |
|
19 |
Town/rural decline (0) |
|
19 |
Increased transportation demand (0) |
|
19 |
Compacting/High Density Development (0) |
|
19 |
Availability of Coastal Insurance (0) |
|
19 |
Concern over increasing air pollution (0) |
Breakout Session: Information or research
ideas What are the information or research questions related to the top
prioritized items?
Conversion of Native Habitat (Breakout group M, Priority 1) Economic viability relies on protecting habitat. The city of
Rockport is currently dealing with this issue. 1) Identify and prioritize critical habitat a. Use a standardized method 2) Criteria should include: a. Ecological function b. Rarity of habitats c. Species of concern dependence on habitats 3) Useful information sources include: a. Universities b. Resource agencies (USFWS, TPWD, GLO permit service
center, etc...) c. Non-governmental agencies (CBBF, CCA, CBBEP, etc...) d. Google e. Impacts as reported from local newspapers f. Resource agencies workshops g. Listserves h. Conservation magazines i. TPWD artificial reef program j. MMS and their continental shelf studies and
publications on website k. Surfrider Foundation
Maintaining Bay Water Quality (Breakout group
A, Priority 1) Baseline water quality information is needed. Water quality also
includes change in chemical composition of stormwater runoff and
increasing runoff from impervious surfaces. Develop a water quality monitoring inventory that determines: 1) Where are we currently monitoring? 2) Who is monitoring? a. NERR Systemwide Monitoring Program b. TCOON c. TCEQ d. TDH 3) What is being collected? 4) Where should we monitor? (This varies according to agency) 5) What are some data sources? a. Agencies b. Students c. Academia 8) Who's currently doing ecosystem valuation for water quality a. Harte Research Institute
Public Apathy and Lack of Awareness (Breakout group M,
Priority 2) 1) Determine level of public awareness a. Workshops b. Advertise with internet, local newspaper, post on
board c. Surveys
- Aransas
County Cooperative Extension -
Quality of Life Survey for Aransas County
- Coastal
Bend Bays and Estuaries Program - Public
Opinion Surveys from 2003 &
2005 for Nueces, San Patricio and
Kleberg Counties
- Harte
Research Institute - Public perception
for freshwater inflow values
- Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department -
Assessing Anglers Boating Behaviors in, and Perceptions of,
Shallow Water Seagrass Habitat.
2) Develop programs that: a. Heavily involve resources agencies b. Make it cool and socially acceptable c. Relate water quality and habitats to hobbies d. Reach a wider audience and target more people e. Enlist and engage volunteers (companies offer
incentives for employees to volunteer) f. Engage high school students (colleges look at
community service hours) g. Show an emotional link to ecosystem (how it affect
where you live) h. Bring your kids to work i. Offer incentives 3) Increase participation in coastal expos, TPWD interactive
activities, earth day bay day, beach cleanups, crab trap cleanup
Loss of Coastal Community Charm (Breakout group A, Priority 2) 1) Establish common definition a. Impact of Change on the Tourism Industry b. Loss of Viewscape c. Impact of outside developers on local communities 2) Quality of life surveys a. Differentiate across locals, visitors, winter
Texans, developers, realtors 3) What are the architectural and aesthetic features that
define/depict coastal bend? 4) What makes it unique? 5) Can consumers discriminate between real and fake? 6) What special foods/culinary features exist? 7) Characterize tourism activities: a. Why do they come? b. Where are they from? c. Which activities do they participate? d. # 1 industry in majority of NERR
Education of Elected Officials about Coastal Issues (Breakout
group A, Priority 2) 1) Baseline of whom? What? Where? When? How? a. Education of the public on environmental
preservation. b. Education of public on landscape design practices c. Making conservation education opportunities for
youth 2) Education service provider resources (inventory) 3) Get different organizations together to collaborate 4) Develop/collect data to share across state in a form similar to
economic indicators (i.e. livestock, oil and gas, agriculture, etc.)
Natural Resource Pressures (Breakout group M, Priority 3) 1) Develop programs that increase and involve community support and
awareness 2) Determine economic valuation of natural resources a. Include data that incorporated inflated values b. Be specific in temporal scope (short-term and
long-term) lack of understanding 3) Dissemination of information a. USFWS habitat programs with municipalities b. Good partnership opportunities c. Make public aware d. Case studies of successful partnerships 4) Enlist government listen to and apply public knowledge a. Local government needs a more active role in
encouraging good or stopping bad development 5) Increase coordination among stakeholders
Lack of Development Controls Outside City Limits (Breakout
group M, Priority 3) 1) Develop a guide for local regulations and mandates
Freshwater inflow into estuary (ecological effects) (Breakout
group A, Priority 3) Look beyond coastal bend boundaries (larger scale). Note that
mitigation may require litigation. 1) What is necessary/adequate water inflow for which ecological
functions? What scale? 2) What cause and effects? 3) What new problems are created by solving other problems? 4) How does this vary by dry-wet season/year? Temp? Location? 5) What land use management practices up-river are affecting
freshwater inflow?
Other details on issues identified from
Breakout Group A: Maintaining/Enhancing Infrastructure (Breakout group
A, Priority 4) More Hike and Bike Trails/Pedestrian walkways Increased Commute Times Maintaining Access to ecosystems/resources with
minimal impact Lack of greenspace Changes in Land Use (12) Loss of Habitat Loss of critical Dune areas Biodiversity Conservation w/ whooping crane as a symbol (11) Invasive Species Coastal Erosion (4) Subsidence Sediment Replacement Resilience to coastal hazards (5) Emergency Planning for Natural Disasters Ability to Timely evacuate population (during
hurricanes) Economic diversity (2) Loss of Commercial Fishing Industry Impacts to Resource-Dependent Industries
If you have any comments or questions
about this summary, please email
Sally Morehead.
Return to MANERR Homepage |